Bob Appleyard: One of Cricket's Almost Greats
As a former spin bowler myself the art of spin bowling has
always fascinated me. Jim Laker to Yasir Shah via Sonny Ramadhin, Derek
Underwood, Shane Warne, Anil Kumble, Muttiah Muralitharan, Graeme Swann, and
many, many others have enthralled my cricket over several decades.
I have seen many of these great spinners operate, but I
never saw Bob Appleyard, whose career was brief, ending when I was 8 years old.
Reading an interview by Chris Waters with two Yorkshire players of the 1950s on
the subject of Fred Trueman I was surprised by their answer when asked, ‘So was
Fred the greatest bowler you played with or against?’. ‘Oh no’, they replied,
‘that would be Bob Appleyard’. I was not just surprised but intrigued. Most
people who followed cricket in England in that era would have admired Jim
Laker, Tony Lock, Ray Illingworth, Johnny Wardle … but only those in the know
would mention Appleyard, who played for England only nine times. What was it
about Appleyard that commanded such deep respect?
We now of course enter that controversial area of judging by
statistics. But they are remarkable. Appleyard took 700 wickets at 15 apiece
(an average beaten in England only by Hedley Verity in the post-World War One
period – before that wickets were usually awful and bowlers made hay). In tests
he took 31 wickets at 17 apiece. His main series was in Australia in 1954-5, so
his efforts were not by any means all on damp turners or ‘sticky dogs’ caused
by the uncovered English pitches of the 1950s. Laker had a much longer career
and took nearly 2000 wickets but at a higher average than Appleyard both in
first class (18) and in test (21) matches. But for Laker, there is no doubt
Appleyard would have played far more times for England than he did.
In style, however, Appleyard was very different from his fellow
off-spinner. Laker was genuinely slow, with a short run and a looping, drifting
flight. Appleyard’s style was closer to Tony Lock’s, who fired in his left arm
spin at medium pace. Appleyard ran in off 15 yards and was closer to medium
pace. Both Laker and Appleyard had a high action, and both were able to make
the ball dip in its flight. Appleyard with his extra height and greater pace made
it rear off a good length.
In an interview with Christopher Martin-Jenkins, Appleyard
in his declining years revealed not just a charm and modesty uncharacteristic
of his fellow Yorkshiremen, but technical detail of great interest. Unlike
Underwood, he explained, he spun the ball off the middle finger, with the index
finger supporting the ball, and with the wrist over, not under, the ball. I am
reminded here of Kumble, whose grip and action were described as those of an
off-spinner bowling leg breaks, with his wrist also over the ball, and who
bowled off a longish run at slow-medium pace. Footage of Appleyard bowling
shows a similar high, bouncy action. Appleyard insisted that to make the ball
dip in flight it must be delivered from behind, not in front of, the head,
letting ball go early in its flight. In addition to off-breaks and leg-cutters
he also bowled seam, mainly in-swing, and so could adapt his technique to any
situation or set of conditions. He even regularly opened the bowling with Fred
Trueman. His Yorkshire spin rival Johnny Wardle likened him to a combination of
Alec Bedser and Jim Laker. Another great Yorkshire bowler, Bill Bowes,
considered Appleyard in the same bracket as Syd Barnes and Bill O’Reilly, both
of whom were noted, not just for being deadly, but for using the totality of
the bowler’s technique (although Barnes insisted that unlike O’Reilly he had no
need of a googly!). This adaptability proved especially important in Australia,
where Appleyard recognised that conditions would be different from what he was used
to, and adjusted his technique successfully.
On the tour of 1954-5 he played in four test matches, taking
only 11 wickets, but at an average (20) better even than Tyson, Statham, Wardle
and Bailey (who destroyed Australia several times over), often bowling in
extreme heat as in the Adelaide test. For this tour he had been preferred to
Laker, with Wardle the other main spinner.
Appleyard missed the first test – fortunately for him as
Australia, inserted, scored 600 against an all-seam attack, and won by an
innings. In the second test, a thriller won by England by 38 runs, Australia
were demolished by Tyson, Statham, and Bailey. Appleyard took the crucial
wicket of Benaud in the second innings, but his 19 not out in a last wicket
stand of 46 with Statham in the second innings gave England an unexpected edge with
a stand just 8 runs more than the margin of victory.
In the fourth test Appleyard’s contribution was major as he
took 6 wickets for 71 in the match – 3 top order batsmen in each innings,
ripping out first the top order then the middle order, including the priceless
wicket of Neil Harvey, as England won with ease. His role was a supporting one
to Wardle in the remainder of the series, but he went on to New Zealand, taking
4 for 7 in New Zealand’s humiliation being bowled out for the lowest ever test
score of 26 at Christchurch.
Appleyard’s major test match feat statistically, however,
was to take 5 for 51 at Nottingham in his first test, the second against
Pakistan in 1954, where they were rolled over for 157 in the first innings.
Appleyard’s victims included the great Hanif Mohamed. Oddly, he did not play
again in that series, in which Wardle, Laker, Tattersall and McConnon also
competed for spinners’ places. When you think that Illingworth and Lock
remained in the wings throughout, it is clear the quality of the field was
extremely high!
Appleyard came late to the game, following a spell in the
leagues, but took 200 wickets in his first full season, 1951, the only bowler
ever to achieve that feat. The following year he was laid low for a whole year
in hospital with TB, having half of one lung removed. It was thought he would
never play again. Indeed he had to learn to walk again as part of a two-year
recovery process. Physical decline during 1956-8 meant that he barely played
six full seasons of cricket at first class level, and his career finished
rather earlier than it might have done but for his physical challenges.
More than this, Appleyard’s whole life was filled with
tragedy. At 15 he discovered his father, step-mother and two younger sisters
gassed in the bathroom. Later he lost both his son and his grandson to
leukaemia. Nonetheless, he appears to have coped well enough to reach 90 before
passing away in 2015, with a cheerful demeanour, an instinct for
institution-building (Yorkshire owes its cricket academy to him), and few
regrets over lack of selection, untimely illness, and both a late start and an
early end to his career. He was unfortunate to have to compete with an England
bowling squad ranked as its best in the entire 20th century.
The 1950s were, it is true, a good time for English spinners
to take wickets and bowl a lot of maiden overs. It is difficult to classify as
really great a bowler who played only nine tests, despite the high opinions
expressed by his peers and the great qualities feared by batsmen in all
conditions. Appleyard’s career is a reminder of the vicissitudes of life and
how a sportsman can come so near to, yet so far from, greatness. It is also a
reminder that adversity is a natural condition and that, like Appleyard, we
should face it with appreciation of the good times and without blame or
resentment. In the context of his life and times, Bob Appleyard enhanced the
game he loved, was fortunate to enjoy a career that might never have happened,
and to have at least touched, if not quite achieving, greatness.
Comments
Post a Comment